An Approach for Agile SOA Development using Agile Principals

In dynamic and turbulent business environment, the need for success and survival of any organization is the ability of adapting to changes efficiently and cost-effectively. So, for developing software applications, one of the methods is Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) methodology and other is Agile Methodology. Since embracing changes is the indispensable concept of SOA development as well as Agile Development, using an appropriate SOA methodology able to adapt changes even during system development with the preservation of software quality is necessary. In this paper, a new approach consisted of five steps is presented to add agility to SOA methodologies. This approach, before any SOA-based development, helps architect(s) to determine Core Business Processes (CBPs) by using agile principals for establishing Core Architecture. The most important advantage of this approach according to the results of case study is possibility of embracing changes with the preservation of software quality in SOA developments.Comment: 8 pages, 1 figure, 1 table; http://airccse.org/journal/ijcsit2012_curr.htm

Lead poisoning among opium users in Iran: an emerging health hazard

Background Lead (Pb) poisoning among people using opium has been an increasing problem in Iran. The present study highlights the clinical effects of lead toxicity associated with opium use in Iran, Kerman province. Methods Between January 2016 and June 2016, patients with signs and symptoms of Pb poisoning were questioned to assess whether they had a history of opium dependency. In total, 249 patients were enrolled onto this cross-sectional study, all were opium dependent. Para-clinical data including blood lead level (BLL), demographic information, user preferences, and symptoms were obtained. Results The patients used either opium (83.9%), refined opium (6.4%) or a combination of both (9.7%) via ingestion (71.9%), smoking (8.4%) or a combination of both (19.7%). The overall median BLL was 80.0 μg/dL [IQR: 51.7–119.0]. The median BLL did not differ significantly between opium and refined opium users. Further, BLL was not significantly affected by the type of substance, route of use, duration of use, or daily quantity consumed. Common symptoms included abdominal pain (86.9%), constipation (75.8%), anorexia (71.5%) and nausea (54.7%). Linear regression analysis showed log of BLL was significantly associated with abdominal pain, myalgia and anorexia. Conclusions The study unravelled an increase in opium-related Pb poisoning in the Kerman province. Raised awareness of this emerging Pb source and investigation of its aetiology is recommended. Pb poisoning should be considered among the primary differential diagnosis of opium users with gastrointestinal symptoms.publishedVersio

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Effect of Organizational Culture on knowledge Management Based on Denison Model

AbstractIn 21th decade, organizations are faced with changes and must know how they learn and manage the learning to be powerful in comparative market. Knowledge management is the way to improve the conditions of stability of organization. When this way is successfully implemented in organization, the appropriate cultural field has already been paved the way for this system. Different researches show that knowing these two factors as the most important necessity is the priority of activities of organizations’ mangers, and the stability of organization is assured by planning organizational strategy. According to the importance of issue, Denison model is used to investigate the dimensions of organizational culture and Conrad and Newman models are used to evaluate the dimensions of knowledge management the process of knowledge management and the relation between them have been explained after mentioning the review of literature. Finally, in order to strengthen organizational culture and successful deployment of knowledge management offered suggestions

Organophosphorus compounds and MAPK signaling pathways

The molecular signaling pathways that lead to cell survival/death after exposure to organophosphate compounds (OPCs) are not yet fully understood. Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) including the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK), the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), and the p38-MAPK play the leading roles in the transmission of extracellular signals into the cell nucleus, leading to cell differentiation, cell growth, and apoptosis. Moreover, exposure to OPCs induces ERK, JNK, and p38-MAPK activation, which leads to oxidative stress and apoptosis in various tissues. However, the activation of MAPK signaling pathways may differ depending on the type of OPCs and the type of cell exposed. Finally, different cell responses can be induced by different types of MAPK signaling pathways after exposure to OPCs

Prognostic factors of acetaminophen exposure in the United States: An analysis of 39,000 patients

International audienceAcetaminophen is a frequently used over-the-counter or prescribed medication in the United States. Exposure to acetaminophen can lead to acute liver cytolysis, acute liver failure, acute kidney injury, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. This retrospective cohort study (1/1/2012 to 12/31/2017) investigated the clinical outcomes of intentional and unintentional acetaminophen exposure using the National Poison Data System data. The frequency of outcomes, chronicity, gender, route of exposure, the reasons for exposure, and treatments as described. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate the prognostic factors and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes. This study included 39,022 patients with acetaminophen exposure. Our study demonstrated that the likelihood of developing severe outcomes increased by aging (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.015) and was lower in females (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.99). Drowsiness/lethargy (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.22–1.82), agitation (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.11–2.50), coma (OR = 23.95, 95% CI: 17.05–33.64), bradycardia (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.22–4.32), rhabdomyolysis (OR = 8.84, 95% CI: 3.71–21.03), hypothermia (OR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.77–9.51), and hyperthermia 2.10 (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.04–4.22) were likely associated with major outcomes or death. Treatments included intravenous N-acetylcysteine (61%), oral N-acetylcysteine (10%), vasopressor (1%), hemodialysis (0.7%), fomepizole (0.1%), hemoperfusion (0.03%), and liver transplant (0.1%). In conclusion, it is important to consider clinical presentations of patients with acetaminophen toxicity that result in major outcomes and mortality to treat them effectively